Private equity "barbarians" win a tax battle
Charles Rangel, the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman has dropped a proposed change in the tax laws that would raise taxes on hedge fund managers. The change was relatively simple, raising the tax rate on fund profits and management fees from the current 15% to the 35% that corporations (are supposed to) pay. Needless to say, the private equity industry fiercely opposed the change, which would have raised $54 billion in new taxes.
The change in the tax code was part of a bill aimed at alleviating the effects of the Alternative Minimum Tax, which now affects 23 million households. The idea was to "fix" the AMT to keep it from being applied to broadly; the resulting loss in revenue could then be made up by increasing taxes on fund managers. But it looks like the managers are too powerful to allow that to happen, at least this time around. Hey, do you think this could have anything to do with campaign contributions and the growing political power of the newly gilded elite? Nah, couldn't be...
Recent Posts
- Investors pressure private equity funds to cut fees (7/03/2009)
- Will an IPO bring more transparency to KKR? (7/02/2009)
- Will FDIC's new rules for buying failed banks deter private-equity investors (7/01/2009)
- Blackstone anticipates recovery in Europe (6/30/2009)
- Carlyle, KKR, JC Flowers and others eye Nan Shan Life (6/29/2009)
BloggingBuyouts is provided for informational purposes only. Nothing on the service is intended to provide personally tailored advice concerning the nature, potential, value or suitability of any particular security, portfolio or securities, transaction, investment strategy or other matter. You are solely responsible for any investment decisions that you make. The contributors who provide the content of BloggingBuyouts may, from time to time, hold positions in the securities discussed at the time of writing and they may trade for their own accounts. Such holdings will be disclosed at the time of writing. By using the site, you agree to abide to BloggingBuyouts' Terms of Use.








Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-13-2007 @ 4:19PM
Existentialist said...
Here is a question: would it be wise to offer tax-breaks to Socially Responsible Investment firms?
---
Existentialist
http://emdm.blogspot.com/