InBev, the Belgian brewer, today hiked its unsolicited bid for Anheuser-Busch Cos. (NYSE: BUD) by a whopping $5 a share, making it all but certain that the King of Beers will sell -- unless members of the board of directors have spent too much time sampling their own product.
The $50 billion offer represents a substantial premium over where Anheuser-Busch has recently traded. InBev clearly wants to avoid the hostile takeover it's threatened. It has vowed to keep its U.S. operations based in the company's hometown of St. Louis. The average drinker of Budweiser probably will not notice a difference in the taste of their favorite brew, which may or may not be a good thing depending on one's beer snobbery.
Shareholders, including Warren Buffett, are ready to head to the exits. The stock, which is up 17% this year, is trading up in pre-market trading. The company has little choice but to take the bid. No other logical buyers exist and I would be surprised if private equity players would be willing to top InBev's offer.
About the only potential losers in this acquisition may be media companies.
Advertising salesmen are probably all holding their breaths wondering whether the new owners of Anheuser-Busch will turn off the money spigot that has made Budweiser one of the most iconic brands in the world. Imagine a weekend baseball game without a Bud commercial? You have to wonder whether InBev will be as enthused to spend big bucks on the Super Bowl as well.
Politicians may lament that Anheuser-Busch is no longer U.S. owned. Then again neither is Miller. BloggingStocks writer Carol Vinzant did an exhaustive piece yesterday listing about two dozen American icons owned abroad.
I guess beer drinkers will have to stick to craft brewers if they want to support U.S. beer makers. That may be short-sighted though. Thanks to free trade, the world has become more global and there is nothing we can do to change it.
In an open letter to his fellow long-suffering Yahoo shareholders, billionaire Carl Icahn disclosed that he has spoken "frequently" with Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer; "frequently" over the past week about Yahoo. Ballmer indicated to Icahn that the world's largest software company would still be interested in doing a deal ... with one catch.
"Steve made it abundantly clear that, due to his experiences with Yahoo! during the past several months, he cannot negotiate any transaction with the current board," Icahn said. "If a new board were elected, he would be interested in discussing a major transaction with Yahoo!, such as either a transaction to purchase the "Search" function with large financial guarantees or, in the alternative, purchasing the whole company. He stated that Microsoft would be willing to enter into discussion immediately if the new board that has been nominated were elected."
In a separate press release, Microsoft underscored Icahn's statement, adding that despite speaking with Yahoo!'s board since last year, the company decided that it cannot reach an agreement with the current board. Can you say trial balloon?
The potential collapse of the $10.6 billion buyout of Huntsman Corp. (NYSE: HUN) is hardly a shock.
For one thing, rising oil prices are crushing specialty chemical makers. Another thing is that the deal was announced almost a year ago, an eternity for the closing of a merger and acquisition. The Wall Street Journal argues that private equity shop Apollo Management and its Hexcion Specialty Chemicals Inc. are making a "novel" argument to get out of the deal.
"In a complaint filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, Hexion said Huntsman's poor financial results -- increased net debt and lower-than-expected earnings -- would render the combined company insolvent," the paper said, adding that legal experts expect Huntsman to file a countersuit. Of course, shares of Salt Lake City-based Huntsman were plunging in premarket action and will likely open much, much lower. CNBC's David Faber points out that the Huntsman deal was "held out" to be the strongest of the LBO deals. That's scary. In a press release, Huntsman CEO Peter Huntsman said, "These actions appear to be a blatant attempt to deprive our shareholders of the benefits of the Merger Agreement that was agreed to nearly a year ago." The company added that it intends to "vigorously enforce" its rights under the merger agreement and seek to consummate the merger under the agreed upon terms.
Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) Chief Executive Jerry Yang is bound to cry "uncle" sooner rather than later.
Pressure is mounting on the co-founder of the internet portal to do something -- anything -- to boost Yahoo's moribund share price. Billionaire activist investor Carl Icahn is leading a mutiny among shareholders disappointed that the company couldn't figure out a way to reach an agreement on a deal with Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT). Display advertising is coming under pressure as advertisers shift spending to search or demand steep rate cuts. Board member Edward Kozel today announced his resignation, another indication of management's growing isolation.
Yahoo management is clearly hunkering down. Today, comes word that the company is delaying its annual meeting from July 3 to the end of July. Is that enough time to reach an agreement with Microsoft or a search deal with Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG)? Who knows? But you can bet that the meeting will not occur until there is some "good news" to report.
Meanwhile, Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer told a technology conference in Moscow that the Yahoo acquisition was not "strategic." Hmm, then why bother doing it? Clearly, Ballmer is posturing to get a better deal with Yahoo. Having Icahn on his side certainly helps.
As for Icahn's threatened proxy fight, the key word here is "threat." The last thing that Icahn wants to do is actually run a company. Operations just aren't his thing. But as he showed with Blockbuster Inc. (NYSE: BBI), Icahn is not afraid to wage proxy contests and win them. In Blockbuster's case, he trounced management. Whether that's a Pyrrhic victory remains to be seen. Shares of Blockbuster have tumbled more than 22% this year and investors are skeptical that buying Circuit City Stores Inc. (NASDAQ: CC) will boost the video-rental firm's lagging fortunes.
So,Yahoo shareholders should hope that Yahoo figures out a way to make Icahn and his allies happy before things get much worse.
According to the Wall Street Journal, talks between the two companies have "heated up recently." Maybe the discussions have obtained a heightened sense of urgency now that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has threatened to make his company's unsolicited bid for Yahoo hostile. Ballmer has given Yahoo until April 26 to respond to the offer. No doubt that deadline will not be the last line in the sand to be drawn.
I still give Microsoft the edge in this contest. The software maker wants Yahoo in the worst way, offering $44.6 billion, or $31 per share, for the beleaguered Internet portal. Time Warner also is under pressure from shareholders to turn around AOL. But unlike Microsoft, it doesn't feel the force of Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) breathing down its neck. I would be surprised if Time Warner would match Microsoft's offer for Yahoo.
I also sincerely doubt that Time Warner shareholders would jump for joy if this deal were to happen. While merging Yahoo and Time Warner's AOL makes sense on some level, it would do little to boost the media conglomerate's share price unless it was accompanied by a spin-off. The headaches such a deal would create would be enormous. Merging MSN and Yahoo would be no picnic either.
Even in a Microsoft/Yahoo deal, MSN would likely cease to exist. Advertisers would never tolerate the duplication of content if Microsoft were to buy Yahoo. Shareholders, who argue that Microsoft is wasting its time chasing Google, wouldn't tolerate it either. Massive layoffs at MSN would result to keep shareholders off Microsoft's back.
Ballmer needs to remember the ancient proverb of being careful what he wishes for because he might get it. Freelance writer Jonathan Berr edits the blog Ketchup and Eggs.
"The interest from Lufthansa, which is based in Germany, is the latest example of foreign investors leveraging the strength of the euro against the dollar," according to the DealBook blog. "By limiting its stake to 20 percent, Lufthansa would remain below federal limits on foreign ownership of a domestic airline. Though the investment will be passive, these people told DealBook, it opens up an opportunity for Lufthansa to make a bigger deal down the road, possibly some kind of partnership."
The investment may be the shot in the arm the Forrest Hills, NY-based company needs as it faces increased competition from the likes of Virgin America and Southwest Airlines Co. (NYSE: LUV). Maybe it will help JetBlue expand to additional markets ,which should give Southwest some serious competition.
Shares of MBIA Inc. (NYSE: MBI) soared almost 30% after the world's largest bond insurer got a $1 billion cash infusion from Warburg Pincus LLC, a private equity firm.
The money couldn't have come at a better time for Armonk, N.Y.-based MBIA, which faced a potentially crippling downgrade from the credit rating agencies As Bloomberg News notes, "MBIA's AAA ranking stands behind $652 billion of state, municipal and structured finance bonds, and losing the AAA credit rating would endanger MBIA's ability to guarantee debt, its main source of revenue."
Under the terms of the agreement, Warburg Pincus will make an initial investment of $500 million through the acquisition of 16.1 million shares at $31 per share, a slight premium over Friday's closing. The investor will also backstop a shareholder rights offering of up to $500 million that MBIA expects to make next year. In addition, Warburg will receive warrants to purchase 8.7 million shares of MBIA common stock at a price of $40, and "B" warrants, which, upon obtaining certain approvals, will become exercisable to purchase 7.4 million shares of stock at $40.
News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) reportedly is in talks to buy social networking site LinkedIn.
"A well-placed source has confirmed with us that these talks are serious," writes VentureBeat's Eric Eldon. "News Corp.'s strategy, from what we understand: Somehow integrate LinkedIn's network with the Wall Street Journal as well as its other newspapers around the world, hopefully figuring out how to recoup News Corp.'s newspapers' declining classified ad revenue in the process."
The strategy makes sense. Plus, Murdoch is eager to bolster the company's social networking business in the face of the rising popularity of MySpace. LinkedIn claims that 14 million professionals use it, representing every member of the Fortune 500. Its investors include Sequoia Capital, Greylock, the European Founders Fund and Bessemer Venture Partners.
As Murdoch has shown with the $5 billion acquisition of Dow Jones & Co. (NYSE: DJ), Murdoch is willing to pay up for something he wants and if shareholders benefit so much the better. Investors continue to be sour on the media sector and will be for a while considering the uncertainty surrounding advertising spending and the overall economy. Shares of News Corp., which recently said earnings were rising ahead of its forecasts, are down 3% this year.
H&R Block Inc. (NYSE: HRB) Chief Executive Mark Ernst today resigned as his efforts to unloaded the company's money-losing subprime mortgage business Option One Mortgage Corp. to Cerberus Capital Management LP nears collapse, according to Bloomberg News.
Former SEC Chairman and hedge fund manager Richard Breeden, who had long complained about losses at Option One and lead a proxy battle against the company, was named chairman and Alan. M. Bennett, a former CFO of Aetna Inc. (NYSE: AET), interim chief executive. H&R Block is conducting a search for a new CEO. Bennett has told the company he doesn't wish to be considered as a candidate, the company said in a press release.
Cerberus agreed to pay H&R Block $800 million for Option One in April, well under the $1.3 billion the company had hoped to get. Cerberus may scuttle the deal entirely now given the continued uncertainty of the credit markets. It's unclear what's going to happen to Option One which Ernst had said H&R Block may close if it couldn't find a buyer, Bloomberg said.
Shares of Kansas City-based H&R Block, which have slumped more than 17% this year, rose in pre-market trading. It will be interesting to see if Breeden will be able to help turn around H&R Block now that he's become an insider.
Mysterious is the mind of media tycoon Rupert Murdoch. Now comes word that the News Corp (NYSE: NWS) CEO considered making a bid for The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT). Exactly how long the mogul entertained such a notion isn't clear. Of course, he eventually went after Wall Street Journal parent Dow Jones & Co. (NYSE: DJ).
Can you imagine a New York Times owned by Murdoch? Frank Rich, Thomas Friedman, Paul Krugman, and Maureen Dowd probably couldn't either. I am sure the four of them would have screamed bloody murder at the thought of working for Murdoch. New York Times Chairman Arthur Sulzberger, whose family has a iron-clad grip on the publisher, would never sell. But Murdoch, who sees The Times as a symbol of all that's bad and liberal about the media, knows all of these and many other reasons why he will never own the Grey Lady. So, why would he waste his time with such a ludicrous idea? I have no idea but dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/15/did-murdoch-mull-a-times-offer/, The Times' business blog, has a novel theory.
"it's possible that the crafty media baron is playing games with the paper he wishes to destroy." the site says.
A group of minority and business leaders including former basketball star Earvin "Magic" Johnson plans to form a group called the Access to Capital Coalition to fight against efforts in Congress to end the tax advantages enjoyed by the hedge fund and private equity industry, according to the Wall Street Journal [subscription].
"Members of the new coalition argue that increasing the taxes on carried interest, also known as the carry, would reduce the incentives for private equity funds to invest and would make it harder to recruit top talent, particularly for small and midsize funds," the paper said. "Many of the new coalition's members run smaller funds that focus on investing in low- and moderate-income areas."
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce released a study today detailing the damage that these proposals could cause the economy, according to Reuters.
So, making hedge fund and private equity billionaires pay their fair share of taxes would somehow hurt poor people. I don't believe it and I doubt this coalition will do much to sway members of Congress. This issue isn't about taxation, it's about fairness.
Instead of paying the ordinary tax rates of 35%, these private equity and hedge fund managers pay the 15% capital gains rate on their carried interest. It's tough for most Americans to understand why one group of very rich people pays much lower taxes than another group of rich people. There is no political upside for any member of Congress to stick up for the industry, particularly as the presidential contest kicks into high gear.
There seems to be broad bipartisan support in Congress to close this loophole. It's not a question of if the industry pays higher taxes but when and how much.
Blackstone Group LP (NYSE: BX) Chief Executive Stephen Schwarzman, who became a billionaire thanks to the firm's recent initial public offering, won't be able to stop the U.S. Congress from making his firms pay higher taxes particularly as the presidential election looms.
Legislation proposed by Sens. Max Baucus (D-MT) and Charles Grassley (R-IA) would TRIPLE the amount of taxes that the New York-based company would pay annually. The company is arguing that the Baucus-Grassley bill raising taxes on private equity and hedge funds would deprive the government of revenue because it would discourage companies from going public.
Blackstone won't win too many friends on Capitol Hill with that argument since hedge funds already get a huge break from the IRS because they pay taxes at the 15% rate of partnerships instead of the 35% corporate tax rate. To many people and quite a few economists this just doesn't seem fair.
Politically speaking this also is a losing issue for Blackstone. Americans believe in the Horatio Alger myth that by hard work and luck anyone can become rich. The public, though, has little sympathy for people who climb their way to the top by cutting corners or getting breaks that they don't seem to deserve.
The Democrats in Congress are well attuned to this reality. For them, there is no better industry to target than hedge funds and private equity firms. To most Americans, the industry is mysterious and scary. What possible downside could they have in targeting the likes of Blackstone?
Walt Disney Corp. (NYSE: DIS), Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA) and Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) may be tempted to pick up the Yankee Entertainment & Sports Network, the cable TV channel that broadcasts the baseball team's games and which Bloomberg News said could be worth as much as $2 billion.
The channel, whose owners include Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) and former New Jersey Nets owner Raymond Chambers, is "running a limited check" and would only consider selling if it got a price "reflecting its real value," spokesman Peter Rose told Bloomberg. Funny guy to be quoted in a baseball story. I guess anything is for sale at the right price. What an original concept.
It will be an interesting test of wills between Disney's ESPN and Comcast. ESPN remains a juggernaut for the house that Mickey built. Comcast is trying to challenge ESPN with its Comcast SportsNet channels including the one I watch in Philadelphia that broadcasts Phillies games.
Remember, we're talking about the Yankees here, one of the most recognized though not necessarily loved franchises in baseball. New Yorkers, though, continue to love their Bronx Bombers even though they have struggled this year.
But the time the YES network is sold, however, slugger Alex Rodriguez will have left the Big Apple for parts unknown. With $2 billion in the bank, I'm sure the team could afford to replace him.
Pearson Plc. (NYSE: PSO) is reportedly interested in making a bid for Dow Jones & Co. (NYSE: DJ) to counter the $5 billion unsolicited offer from Rupert Murdoch's News Corp (NYSE: NWS). The problem is that the U.K. company can't beat Murdoch on its own and will have difficulty finding partners willing to take on the Australian media mogul.
The Wall Street Journal says that the owner of the Financial Times has been trying in recent weeks to recruit partners to pursue a bid for Dow Jones though a formal offer is a "long shot." General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE)'s NBC Universal has rebuffed Pearson, which also approached Hearst Corp., the paper said.
Since nothing has actually happened yet, the question arises about who leaked the story. Was it the Bancrofts, who control Dow Jones, trying to find a white knight to rescue them from the evil Murdoch? Maybe it was a Pearson banker or a banker from one of the companies that was approached by the publisher.
If there is a bidding war for Dow Jones & Co. (NYSE: DJ), Rupert Murdoch's lust for power will trump the desire for profits from private equity players such as Blackstone Group LP, Texas Pacific Group or KKR, or any other potential bidders.
Shares of the New York-based financial information company have already soared past the insanely high unsolicited $60 per share offer the CEO of News Corp (NYSE: NWS) has made. Murdoch, though, has coveted The Wall Street Journal for years and would be willing to pay an even steeper price to turn his dream into reality. It wouldn't be a stretch for Murdoch to bid $65 or $70 to snap up Dow Jones.
Other potential buyers view Dow Jones as just a business while Murdoch is most interested in the company's ability to influence the public heading into a presidential election. He is an uneconomical bidder who doesn't mind if some of his media properties lose a little money provided that they further his political agenda.
To be sure, there are some sound economic reasons for a merger between Dow Jones and News Corp. The Journal could certainly give a boost to the nascent Fox business news channel. Though Dow Jones has gotten better under CEO Rich Zannino, the company was mismanaged for years, so there are no doubt still cost savings to be had.
But many questions are yet to be answered.
Would Murdoch -- who has vowed not to interfere with the Journal's news coverage -- keep that promise for other Dow Jones properties? What would become of MarketWatch, Barron's and Dow Jones Newswires? Would WSJ.com remain a subscription service?
BloggingBuyouts is provided for informational purposes only. Nothing on the service is intended to provide personally tailored advice concerning the nature, potential, value or suitability of any particular security, portfolio or securities, transaction, investment strategy or other matter. You are solely responsible for any investment decisions that you make. The contributors who provide the content of BloggingBuyouts may, from time to time, hold positions in the securities discussed at the time of writing and they may trade for their own accounts. Such holdings will be disclosed at the time of writing. By using the site, you agree to abide to BloggingBuyouts' Terms of Use.
BloggingBuyouts is the best resource for news, opinion, and research on the least understood, most powerful force driving financial markets today -- private equity investing. Michael Rainey, editor.
For more coverage of America's favorite publicly traded stocks, check out BloggingStocks
InBev, the Belgian brewer, today hiked its unsolicited bid for Anheuser-Busch Cos. (NYSE: BUD) by a whopping $5 a share, making it all but certain that the King of Beers will sell -- unless members of the board of directors have spent too much time sampling their own product.
The 
The potential collapse of the $10.6 billion buyout of
Yahoo! Inc.
.jpg){kind=logo}
Will 
Shares of 
If there is a bidding war for 
