Many of the bit players are being flushed out of private equity by the tight credit market, and Fidelity Investments, which will close its private equity division next month, is no exception. While buyouts have never been a significant part of the company's business, the firm was managing $500 million as part of an operation that was founded two years ago -- at or near the height of the private equity boom.

Fidelity's private equity arm has investments in four companies, but spokeswoman Ann Crowley told The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) that "Basically debt financing is largely unavailable because of the economic conditions of the last several months."

Investors have long coveted hot initial public offerings. But access to the biggest IPOs usually requires big money and insider connections. However, a deal between Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and Fidelity Investments may change that.

The companies are reportedly near a deal to give some of Fidelity's 20 million individual and institutional clients access to IPOs by the stable of companies in which KKR has made private equity investments.

At the height of the buyout boom in 2007, private equity firms amassed expansive portfolios. Some of the drivers of the trend included: a growing economy and easy debt markets.

Of course, dealmaking has ground to a halt over the past couple years. However, private equity firms still need to find ways to get liquidity from their portfolios, so as to produce returns for limited partners.

How? Well, the IPO market will be crucial.

So, to this end, Fidelity Investments and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) have agreed to form a venture to distribute IPOs to retail investors. Keep in mind that such offerings typically go to institutions and wealthy individuals. But private equity firms will need to expand their reach.

Now it looks like the media has a new Madoff angle to chew on. He made up the account statements that he sent to his victims. And investigators can find no evidence that he conducted any trades. For example, one Madoff victim's November 2008 account statement showed all sorts of trades -- including the buying and selling of shares in Fidelity's Spartan US Treasury Money Market Fund. But Fidelity has no record that Madoff's firm dealt with the Fidelity unit the works with investment advisers like Madoff.

If Madoff was not making up account statements he could not have pulled off his fraud. Of course the same thing can be said for Satyam Computer Services (NYSE: SAY) and Enron. As I have posted, when you allow a company or an investment manager to write their own report card, you are just asking for trouble. Simply banning that practice and replacing it with a 100% independent group of financial statement preparers would save society uncounted misery.

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and is the author of You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing. He owns Fidelity's Spartan US Treasury Money Market Fund shares and has no financial interest in the other securities mentioned.

After the stock market meltdown of 2008, Wall Street brokerages aren't anyone's favorites in 2009.

But some customers said they're still happy with their online broker.

A December ChangeWave survey of 3,051 consumers found that despite the extremely difficult financial market, two online brokerages still capture high customer satisfaction ratings -- Charles Schwab (NASDAQ: SCHW) and archrival, Scottrade.

During these times of crushing financial news, collapsing stock markets combined with tremendous volatility, government ineptitude (what else is new), doubt, pessimism, and yes -- fear --- we all need to hear the reassuring words of one of our most successful investment sages.

'My pal Warren' has been filling the media with market supporting bits of wisdom and backing it up by making strategic investments through Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) and more investments utilizing his personal fortune.

Yesterday I received the following in an email quoting Peter Lynch, who managed to gain an average of 29.7% per year for 13 straight years while he was running Fidelity Magellan fund. Once someone asked him how he knows what stage the market is at, he replied:

• "If I go to a party, and introduce myself as a mutual fund manager to strangers, and they walk away from me and talk to other people instead, I know the market is near the bottom. If they sit down and ask me what stocks they should buy, the market is at normal levels. If they sit down and TELL ME what stocks to buy, the market is near the top."

DealBook reports that Fidelity Investments has agreed to buy back $300 million worth of auction-rate securities (ARS). This settlement is a first in the sense that the previous redeemers were ARS issuers. Fidelity is considered to be "downstream" from the issuers. And its decision to settle puts pressure on other downstream participants such as Oppenheimer and Raymond James.

Exactly what has Fidelity agreed to do? "According to the terms of the deal, the first struck with a 'downstream' seller of these securities, Fidelity will not pay a fine. The firm will buy back auction-rate securities from individuals, charities and institutional investors alike, making no distinction among investor classes, as previous settlements with other firms have," DealBook writes.

Of the $330 billion in ARS that were issued, only 10% have been redeemed so far -- "the big banks have repurchased more than $35 billion of the securities and paid more than $360 million in fines," according to DealBook. I am impressed that regulators are continuing to push hard to get ARS issuers to take care of these investors given all the distraction from the weekly collapse of one major financial institution after another.

This is the part of a new series of columns called "The Naked Truth," by retirement expert Dan Solin. Please bring him your questions, in the comments box, and he will answer as many as he can.

Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin were indicted on June 18, 2008. They are accused of a litany of fraudulent activities in connection with the demise of two hedge funds they managed for Bear Stearns.

Cioffi and Tannin are entitled to the presumption of innocence. The obligatory "perp walk," staged for the benefit of the press, is offensive to traditional notions of justice. Not only does it demean and humiliate them, it taints the jury pool and intrudes upon their right to a fair trial.

Nevertheless, the indictment offers an insight into conduct that would otherwise be inexplicable.

Here are two highly educated, sophisticated, fund managers who achieved the American dream -- and then some. Why would they risk it all by, as alleged, misrepresenting the risk of these funds, and their personal stake in them?

This post is part of our Battle of the Brands feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and check out other Battle of the Brands posts.

To some degree, a face-off between Vanguard and Fidelity is really a face-off between John Bogle, Vanguard's founder, and Peter Lynch, Fidelity's star fund manager. While Bogle was a pioneer in no-load and low-cost investing in index funds, Lynch was a proponent of investing in "what you know," or getting investing ideas from your day-to-day life. BloggingStocks covered this Bogle vs. Lynch match up back in September, and readers gave the financial edge to Lynch.

Privately held Fidelity Investments is made up by two independent but closely cooperating companies: Boston-based Fidelity Management and Research LLC serves the North American market, and Fidelity International Limited (FIL), spun off in 1969, provides investment products and services to clients in the rest of the world. Fidelity reported revenue of $12.87 billion in 2006, by offering a large family of mutual funds, as well as providing discount brokerage services, retirement services, estate planning, wealth management, securities execution and clearance, life insurance, and a number of other financial services. The founding Johnson family still controls Fidelity, but Peter Lynch and some other fund managers also hold stakes in the company.

This post is one of several on business heirs apparent. Let us know in the comments whether you think Abigail Johnson should take up the reigns of Fidelity, and be sure to check out the other heir apparent posts.

I covered the mutual fund business for about six years in the 1990s, when Fidelity Investments was all the rage. It had the most star managers, the best performing funds and by far the most assets. It had the awe-inspiring Fidelity Magellan! And that was nothing to sneer at back then.

So it was with great interest when I learned that Abigail Johnson, the daughter of CEO 'Ned' Johnson (himself an heir to Fidelity), and a woman near my age (she's 46), was being primed to take over the company. I have been cheering for her ever since. (Even as I wonder if the only way a woman can get to the top of a major financial services firm is by having her father run the place).

Google
Weiner likes Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG). Weiner says of the search giant, "I don't think there's [strong] threats to their paid search advertising model." Interestingly, Weiner says that Google's biggest threat is not being a one-product pony, as many analysts and pundits criticize the company. Rather, Weiner is nervous about the expansionist drives of Google management into businesses that may not be nearly as attractive as paid search.