bloggingbuyouts

One of the more depraved sagas in our nation's long and pathetic history of corporate governance has come to a close.

Topps (NYSE: TOPP), a maker of sports cards and candy, says that shareholders have approved a $9.75 per share offer from Madison Dearborn Partners and Tornante, a private equity firm controlled by Michael Eisner.

Upper Deck had offered $10.75 per share in a hostile offer, but finally withdrew the offer last month, saying the following:

...roadblocks have been created by Topps as part of a deliberate effort to discredit UD (both publicly and internally with the Topps employees upon whom UD would need to rely post-closing of this acquisition), defeat UD's offer, and justify entrenched management's continued shameless support of the less favorable Tornante/Madison Dearborn transaction. It is now abundantly clear that Topps will attempt to impede any and all reasonable efforts to consummate the UD merger, which thus cannot possibly be consummated under the current circumstances...

Although relatively small in size, the Topps buyout presented as much drama as any recent takeover battle. The company had been underperforming for years, had several angry activist hedge funds pushing for chance. When it accepted the offer from Tornante, it insisted that it was in the best interests of shareholders -- in fact it was better than offer that was more than 10% better!

Then Topps forgot to disclose that, oh, by the way, the CEO would get to stay on as a consultant newly-private company, although many shareholders had been calling for their heads for years. After a judge chastised them, they disclosed the conflict of interest in an 8-K filing.

Someday, Topps will be a Harvard Business School case study on incompetent management and bad corporate governance.

Upper Deck has advised Topps (NASDAQ: TOPP) that the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 has expired with no request for additional information, satisfying one of the conditions of Upper Deck's tender offer for the company.

According to a press release put out by Topps:

Topps noted that it continues to negotiate with Upper Deck to see if a consensual transaction can be reached. Topps cautions, however, that there can be no assurance that a transaction will be reached with Upper Deck. The Topps Board has not withdrawn or amended its recommendation with respect to the merger agreement with The Tornante Company and Madison Dearborn Partners.

Topps is recommending that its shareholders accept the $9.75 bid from Tornante and Madison Dearborn when a $10.75 offer is on the table and the stock is currently trading at $10.14. I suppose that next we will hear the Topps is advising its shareholders to hand in their $10 bills for a five and four ones.

As I've written before on BloggingStocks, the management and board at Topps is looking more and more like a complete disgrace to corporate governance. The current management team has a deal in place allowing them to keep their jobs if Madison Dearborn and Tornante acquire the company, although most shareholders would agree that their leadership has been pathetic.

For more of my coverage of the battle for Topps, check out:

Will Eisner and Co. Collect Topps?

Upper Deck Gets Hostile in Pursuit of Topps

The saga of the Topps (NASDAQ: TOPP) buyout has dragged on far longer than anyone could have predicted. When the trading card company agreed to be acquired by Madison Dearborn Partners and Michael Eisner's The Tornante Company for $9.75 per share, BloggingStocks' Tom Taulli wrote that Topps had hit a single. He wasn't the only one who was less than enthused about the buyout. Several dissident Topps directors voted against the deal, and Topps responded by barring them from the go-shop process. Then Upper Deck made an offer of $10.75, and Topps rejected it, saying that Upper Deck didn't have financing and that the proposal had antitrust concerns. Upper Deck responded with a hostile tender offer.

Given the size of the buyout -- less than $420 million -- the deal has generated a lot of buzz. Perhaps it's that so many of us covering the deal have nostalgic memories of collecting our baseball heroes. But the level of rhetoric and the amount of back and forth has also made the deal interesting.

It's hard to know exactly how this will end -- will Eisner & co. raise their bid? The matter has ended up in court with a judge chastising Eisner and Topps with good reason -- the company forgot to tell shareholders that Eisner had agreed to keep the much-maligned current management team in place after the buyout.

BusinessWeek's Ronald Glover takes an interesting look at Michael Eisner's role in this whole mess, referring to him as the "drive-by victim of what's fast becoming a shareholder circus".

At this point, I would say that Upper Deck looks like the favorite to go home with Topps. The shares are trading at $10.59, indicating that shareholders are confident it won't go for the original $9.75 offer. The small spread between the current price and Upper Deck's offer indicates that investors believe an even higher offer could emerge.

The BusinessWeek piece cites sources who say that Eisner is unlikely to raise his offer, but it might be a mistake to count him out just yet.

As for his show on CNBC, I think you probably can count that one out. He's no Larry King, although King was recently a guest on the show.

When BloggingStocks's Tom Taulli wrote that Topps (NASDAQ: TOPP) had hit a single with its agreement to be acquired by Madison Dearborn Partners and The Tornante Company, he realized a problem with the proposed buyout that has come to irritate many of the company's largest shareholders. The $9.75 per share offer wasn't much of a premium to the current share price, and left the company's long-term shareholders with a return on investment that was mediocre at best.

Then a grey knight arrived on the scene. Competitor Upper Deck came forward with an offer of $10.75 per share, but Topps rejected the offer, saying that Upper Deck had not demonstrated adequate financing and had failed to offer an adequate break-up fee. Topps also cited anti-trust concerns given that Topps and Upper Deck are the two biggest players in the trading card industry.

Having been spurned by Topps's management, Upper Deck is turning up the heat with a tender offer for all of the company's shares at $10.75 each, a premium of 10.25% to the $9.75 that Topps had previously agreed to be acquired at.

There's sure to be a lot more drama to come and the history of Topps had plenty of drama before this even started. Check out this Wikipedia entry for a nice overview of the company's history.

Topps's (NASDAQ: TOPP) deal to be acquired by private equity firms continues to generate angst from some of its largest shareholders. Hedge fund Crescendo Partners argued that the company's CEO, Arthur Shorin had a conflict of interest in negotiating with Upper Deck, a competitor who has made an offer for the company, because Shorin "does not want to see the company started by his father and uncles fall into the hands of a longtime rival."

Today Arnaud Ajdler, Crescendo's managing partner and a director at Topps, delivered a letter to the company's board, "in response to certain false and misleading statements included in a letter from Arthur Shorin, Topps' Chairman and CEO, to Mr. Ajdler dated May 31, 2007." Here are some of the highlights:

Finally, in your communications, you like to repeat that Crescendo wants to take over Topps without paying stockholders for their shares. Once again, you are misleading your stockholders. When a buyer wants to take a company private, as Mr. Eisner and Madison Dearborn are attempting to do, the buyer pays stockholders a premium for their shares. While this premium is typically 20 to 30%, you have approved a transaction that would pay stockholders a meager 3% premium and a significant discount to where the shares are currently trading... If the ill-advised Eisner merger is voted down, Crescendo will ask its fellow stockholders, the true owners of Topps, to replace seven of the incumbent directors on the Board with a new slate... As detailed in our proxy statement, we believe that the Company could be worth conservatively between $16 and $18 per share if managed properly.